top of page
War For Israel.png

Day 15: Decoding the Israel-Hamas Puzzle: Unraveling the Complications

Written by:
Yishai Gelb

In the midst of the escalating conflict between Hamas and Israel, the delayed ground invasion by the IDF sparks multifaceted speculation. Theories range from U.S. influence and hostage considerations to strategic caution in the densely populated northern Gaza. The envisioned campaign strategy involves bifurcating the strip, with the IDF tactically withholding necessities in the north. Concurrently, Israel navigates delicate fronts with Hezbollah and Syria, while Sunni Arab nations secretly favor an Israeli victory. A Cairo peace summit reveals divergent perspectives and global reactions to the war provide insight into international alliances. As the complex geopolitical theater unfolds, the conversation shifts towards post-war scenarios and alternative solutions for Gaza. The evolving narrative promises further intricacies on the global stage.

Day 15: Decoding the Israel-Hamas Puzzle: Unraveling the Complications

In the heart of the escalating conflict between Hamas and Israel, a pervasive uncertainty engulfs the geopolitical landscape—the timing of the ground invasion. It has been a protracted two weeks since the commencement of hostilities by Hamas, yet the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) exhibit a conspicuous reluctance to mobilize their ground troops into the volatile terrain of Gaza. This divergence from the historical swiftness with which Israel has resolved its past conflicts has birthed a mosaic of perspectives on the enigmatic reasons behind the apparent stalling of the much-anticipated ground invasion.

A notable narrative threads through the complex tapestry, implicating the United States and the leadership of Benjamin Netanyahu. Analysts, delving into the intricacies of the war cabinet, speculate on the extent of American involvement and influence, postulating scenarios where the U.S. either deliberately stalls the ground invasion indefinitely or strategically delays it to afford more time in the search for hostages. Recent events, such as the release of American hostages to the IDF, are scrutinized for potential U.S. influence, introducing an added layer of ambiguity to the ongoing geopolitical drama. Simultaneously, there exists a divergent school of thought suggesting that Hamas, cognizant of the potential perils that a ground assault poses, may be applying pressure to forestall the invasion, possibly fearing the repercussions it may unleash.

2 American Hostages released by Hamas

President Biden reacting to a question about a US reaction to a possible Hizballah Attack.

Delving deeper into the strategic considerations, an alternate perspective emerges, asserting that the deferment of the ground assault is a calculated and prudent move by the IDF. The densely populated northern region of Gaza emerges as a formidable obstacle, where initiating a ground invasion amidst a civilian population could have catastrophic consequences. The specter of Hamas fighters entrenching themselves in urban areas, coupled with the potential for booby traps, paints a grim picture for the IDF. To mitigate collateral damage and the exploitation of such outcomes on the global stage, strategic alternatives are considered. Evacuation of civilians and the tactical use of starvation as a means to force Hamas fighters out of their tunnels are proposed as nuanced strategies, emphasizing the complexity and multifaceted nature of the decision-making process.

The potential campaign plan, as discerned from the evolving narrative, paints a strategic masterpiece: the IDF initiating its incursion through the Gaza River West, effectively bifurcating the strip and isolating the northern region. A stark dichotomy arises, with humanitarian aid flowing to the south, contrasting sharply with a deliberate deprivation of necessities to the north. This dual-pronged approach seeks to exert pressure on Hamas, presenting them with the dire choice of surrender or enduring the consequences of their isolation. The Israeli Air Force (IAF), integral to the overarching strategy, is envisioned as playing a pivotal role in diminishing the brutality of urban warfare through precision strikes aimed at minimizing collateral damage.

Simultaneously, beyond the confines of the impending ground invasion, Israel engages in a delicate dance to fortify its northern and eastern fronts, pre-emptively addressing potential threats. Hezbollah in Lebanon, armed with an arsenal exceeding 100,000 missiles directed at Israel, emerges as a formidable adversary. Israel navigates this perilous terrain with caution, orchestrating a delicate balancing act that keeps Hezbollah engaged with Hamas without triggering an all-encompassing conflagration. To the east, Syria aligns itself with Iranian proxies and begins to arm itself with missiles, prompting proactive Israeli strikes aimed at neutralizing potential threats and precluding the emergence of a third front to the Northeast.

The complex geopolitical theater extends its tendrils into the Arab world, ostensibly united in public condemnation of Israel. However, a nuanced undercurrent suggests a more intricate narrative. Sunni Arab nations, while constrained by the exigencies of public posturing, discreetly harbor a desire for an Israeli triumph against Hamas. This covert alignment is rooted in a shared interest in weakening the influence of the Iranian regime and its proxy groups throughout the Middle East. Nations such as the UAE, Bahrain, Egypt, Jordan, and even Saudi Arabia are conjectured to be quietly rooting for the success of the Israeli campaign, as the subtle interplay of geopolitical interests unfolds against the backdrop of the broader Middle East landscape.

From the Cairo conference

A pivotal moment materializes in the form of a peace summit convened in Cairo, drawing representatives from diverse nations, including Europe, Japan, China, Russia, and the United Nations. The summit, ostensibly aimed at fostering peace, unveils a panorama of conflicting interests and divergent perspectives on the fate of Gaza's beleaguered population. Denunciations of violence and appeals for an end to hostilities coalesce into a broader conversation about the displacement and humanitarian needs of the Gaza people. A peculiar note emerges from the symphony of diplomatic discourse—while nations like Egypt and Jordan express reluctance to accommodate displaced Gazans, Scotland inexplicably emerges as a seemingly incongruous champion of their cause.

Amidst the immediate tumult of war, a forward-looking discourse emerges—a contemplation of the post-war landscape. While premature in its inception, the conversation revolves around the day after, unraveling potential scenarios and alternative solutions for the Gaza Strip. It becomes evident that while many nations secretly harbor a desire for the removal of Hamas, the quest for alternative governance models and solutions for the rehabilitation of Gaza takes precedence in diplomatic corridors.

The international stage, as a silent spectator to the unfolding drama, witnesses a fascinating interplay of support and condemnation for both Israel and Hamas. Global reactions manifested through images and narratives disseminated worldwide, offer a kaleidoscopic view into the alliances, sympathies, and ideological predispositions shaping the discourse. Take a look at the reactions in different countries across the globe:


Canada: Trudo sympathizing with the Muslim communities


Russia: Hamas supporters show support for Putin and North Korea showing where their support lies.


India: Palestinian supporters accidentally wave Italian flags thinking they are Palestinian flags


Iran: At a soccer match, Iranians refused to stand for a minute of silence in memory of Gaza casualties.


United States

Man selling both Israel and Palestine flags. Capitalism always wins!


Republican Presidential candidate sounding off on the conflict.

As the days unfold, the trajectory of the conflict remains uncertain, with the IDF's warplane poised to unveil the next chapter in this intricate geopolitical saga. The evolving narrative promises to unravel new layers of complexity, presenting a dynamic tableau that captivates the world's attention and leaves an indelible mark on the geopolitical landscape.

Supporting the IDF

We are thrilled to share with you Connections Israel's upcoming project: our Winter Campaign. It's more than just a drive; it's a movement to bring warmth and support to our soldiers on the Northern front. As the heat intensifies on the Lebanon front, the potential for a second front against Hizballa looms.

Now, more than ever, our soldiers need our collective strength and generosity.

Supporting Israeli Farmers


Support Israeli farmers in Israel, many of whom have been called up to defend the state of Israel. They are bravely fighting alongside their units to protect our nation. As the harvest approaches, we cannot afford to wait for the war to end!

Create your privately labeled olive oil wine and whisky from farmers in Israel. shipped to your doorstep!

bottom of page